Interactive Worksheet

Your Network Diversity Audit


Who you talk to shapes what you believe. Research shows that the people you discuss important matters with, your close ties, have significant influence on your beliefs. This tool helps you assess how diverse those relationships are and what that may mean for how you process information. Next, we will address social media feeds.

For reflection and educational purposes only. Scores are rough estimates meant to prompt thinking, not precise measurements. Think of this as a mirror, not a diagnostic tool. No data is collected unless you choose to share it.
1
Your Network
2
Beliefs
3
Your Feeds
4
Reflect
Who do you discuss important matters with?

Think about the people in your life you'd turn to for a meaningful conversation or advice about something important: friends, family, colleagues, mentors. List up to 6 names.

πŸ’‘ Don't overthink the names, go with whoever comes to mind first to determine your inner circle. I don't collect data here, but feel free to use pseudonyms or initials.
People added 0
How do their beliefs compare to yours?

For each person, rate how similar their beliefs are to yours across two dimensions. You don't need to know exactly, go with your best sense.

πŸ’‘ Research shows that even one person with different views in your close network can meaningfully reduce belief extremity. Small differences matter.
How diverse are your social media feeds?

Your close network is your most important influence, but your feeds add another layer. For each platform you use, rate how often you encounter viewpoints different from your own.

πŸ’‘ Think about what the algorithm actually surfaces for you. A feed that mostly shows one perspective, even if it's the opposite of yours, still limits your exposure to a genuine range of viewpoints.
What your network reveals
Evidence-Based Insights: Facciani & Brashears (2019); Facciani & Traberg (2024); Bail et al. (2018)

Research shows that the people you discuss important matters with have a strong influence on your beliefs. When your close ties share the same political or religious views, those beliefs get reinforced through what sociologists call a plausibility structure: the more your inner circle agrees, the more certain you feel, even when a belief may be inaccurate. Importantly, having even one person with different views in your close network is linked to less extreme beliefs. Small differences matter.

Research on how feeds shape beliefs is more mixed. Social media can reinforce existing identities through "reinforcing spirals" : we seek affirming content, and algorithms amplify it. But exposure to opposing views alone doesn't always reduce bias. In one study, people paid to follow opposing political accounts became more polarized, not less : passive exposure can strengthen identity rather than broaden perspective. What matters most is the quality of engagement. These feed ratings are meant to prompt reflection, not to imply that a higher score automatically makes you more resilient.

πŸ’¬ Want to learn how to have more productive conversations across difference? Explore more in Misguided β†’
Try adding different people to see how your score changes.
πŸ”’ Your data stays on your device. This tool does not collect or store any of your responses. If you'd like to voluntarily share your score and feedback to help improve future versions, you can do so here: Share my score & feedback β†’
πŸ—ΊοΈ Want to see the full picture? Map your social identities next β†’ and explore how your identity complexity and network diversity compare.